↓ Skip to main content

Distribution of physiological adult lactase phenotypes, lactose absorber and malabsorber, in Germany

Overview of attention for article published in Human Genetics, December 1982
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Distribution of physiological adult lactase phenotypes, lactose absorber and malabsorber, in Germany
Published in
Human Genetics, December 1982
DOI 10.1007/bf00282305
Pubmed ID
Authors

G. Flatz, J. N. Howell, J. Doench, S.D. Flatz

Abstract

A total of 1805 apparently healthy, adult and adolescent Germans (1572 males and 233 females with a mean age of 20.3 years) were examined for lactose absorption capacity employing a field version of the breath hydrogen (H2) test. The diagnostic parameter, maximal change of breath hydrogen concentration 120 or 150 min after a load of 50 g lactose, showed a bimodal distribution, separating lactose absorbers (n = 1537, 85.2%) and lactose malabsorbers (n = 268, 14.8%). The distribution of the adult lactase phenotypes was independent of age, sex, and educational status. The incidence of gastrointestinal symptoms after lactose administration demonstrated the incongruity of lactose malabsorption and lactose intolerance. In addition to grouping by residence, the probands were classified according to the birthplaces of their grandparents in order to reconstruct the distribution pattern of the lactase phenotypes prior to World War I, a period of relative population stability. Considerable differences in the frequency of lactose malabsorption were found in regions corresponding to traditional ethnic groups within the German population: northwest Germany 6-9%, west and south 13-14%, southwest 23%, east (including formerly German territories east of rivers Oder and Neisse) 22%. These differences are discussed with reference to population history. The present fairly even distribution of the lactase phenotypes in West Germany is the result of internal migrations at the end of World War II.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 6%
Unknown 15 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 6 38%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Professor 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 6 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Psychology 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 2 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2016.
All research outputs
#7,451,584
of 22,780,967 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#933
of 2,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,984
of 33,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,967 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,951 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 33,360 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them