| Title |
Multiplicative Calculus in Biomedical Image Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, March 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10851-011-0275-1 |
| Authors |
Luc Florack, Hans van Assen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | 3% |
| Turkey | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 25 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 28% |
| Researcher | 6 | 21% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 11 | 38% |
| Engineering | 7 | 24% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 7% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2023.
All research outputs
#5,763,559
of 23,572,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision
#40
of 312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,329
of 121,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,572,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 312 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,334 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.