↓ Skip to main content

What do the basal ganglia do? A modeling perspective

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Cybernetics, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
172 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
420 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
What do the basal ganglia do? A modeling perspective
Published in
Biological Cybernetics, July 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00422-010-0401-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

V. S. Chakravarthy, Denny Joseph, Raju S. Bapi

Abstract

Basal ganglia (BG) constitute a network of seven deep brain nuclei involved in a variety of crucial brain functions including: action selection, action gating, reward based learning, motor preparation, timing, etc. In spite of the immense amount of data available today, researchers continue to wonder how a single deep brain circuit performs such a bewildering range of functions. Computational models of BG have focused on individual functions and fail to give an integrative picture of BG function. A major breakthrough in our understanding of BG function is perhaps the insight that activities of mesencephalic dopaminergic cells represent some form of 'reward' to the organism. This insight enabled application of tools from 'reinforcement learning,' a branch of machine learning, in the study of BG function. Nevertheless, in spite of these bright spots, we are far from the goal of arriving at a comprehensive understanding of these 'mysterious nuclei.' A comprehensive knowledge of BG function has the potential to radically alter treatment and management of a variety of BG-related neurological disorders (Parkinson's disease, Huntington's chorea, etc.) and neuropsychiatric disorders (schizophrenia, obsessive compulsive disorder, etc.) also. In this article, we review the existing modeling literature on BG and hypothesize an integrative picture of the function of these nuclei.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 420 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 11 3%
United States 7 2%
France 4 <1%
Australia 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Other 6 1%
Unknown 380 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 90 21%
Researcher 68 16%
Student > Master 65 15%
Student > Bachelor 47 11%
Student > Postgraduate 19 5%
Other 66 16%
Unknown 65 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 74 18%
Psychology 63 15%
Neuroscience 52 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 51 12%
Engineering 32 8%
Other 68 16%
Unknown 80 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2023.
All research outputs
#7,730,207
of 23,504,694 outputs
Outputs from Biological Cybernetics
#191
of 684 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,411
of 96,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Cybernetics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,504,694 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 684 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,175 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them