↓ Skip to main content

Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Drug Safety, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
Title
Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome
Published in
Drug Safety, November 2012
DOI 10.2165/00002018-199819010-00006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Varadaraj R. Velamoor

Abstract

Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is a rare but potentially lethal form of drug-induced hyperthermia characterised by mental status changes, muscle rigidity, hyperthermia and autonomic dysfunction. Increased awareness and early recognition will lead to prompt management. The diagnosis of NMS presents a challenge because several medical conditions generate similar symptoms. The presentation and course of NMS can be quite variable ranging from a stormy and potentially fatal course to a relatively benign and self-limiting course. The most important aspect of treatment is prevention. This includes reducing risk factors (e.g. dehydration, agitation and exhaustion), early recognition of suspected cases and prompt discontinuation of the offending agent. All patients with psychosis should be monitored daily for dehydration and elevated temperature, have vital signs checked and agitation should be watched for. Antipsychotics should be used conservatively with gradual titration of doses. The management of NMS should be based on a hierarchy of symptom severity. Following an episode of NMS, the patient should be reassessed for further treatment with antipsychotics and rechallenge should not be attempted at least 2 weeks following resolution of symptoms of NMS. The patient and family should be educated about the episode and consent for further medication use obtained after a clear explanation of the risk-benefit analysis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 80 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 12 15%
Student > Postgraduate 10 12%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Master 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Other 18 22%
Unknown 18 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 45%
Psychology 9 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 24 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2023.
All research outputs
#3,261,690
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Drug Safety
#361
of 1,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,467
of 285,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug Safety
#134
of 836 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,852 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 836 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.