↓ Skip to main content

Salt tolerance of two aquatic macrophytes, Pistia stratiotes and Salvinia molesta

Overview of attention for article published in Biologia Plantarum, March 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#37 of 215)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
Title
Salt tolerance of two aquatic macrophytes, Pistia stratiotes and Salvinia molesta
Published in
Biologia Plantarum, March 2005
DOI 10.1007/s10535-005-7159-4
Authors

R. K. Upadhyay, S. K. Panda

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Argentina 1 2%
Unknown 50 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 22%
Researcher 5 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 17 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 35%
Environmental Science 12 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Unknown 17 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2018.
All research outputs
#7,451,584
of 22,780,967 outputs
Outputs from Biologia Plantarum
#37
of 215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,782
of 59,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biologia Plantarum
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,967 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 215 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,926 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them