↓ Skip to main content

A novel and safe approach: middle cranial approach for laparoscopic right hemicolon cancer surgery with complete mesocolic excision

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
A novel and safe approach: middle cranial approach for laparoscopic right hemicolon cancer surgery with complete mesocolic excision
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00464-017-5982-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Songtao Du, Bomiao Zhang, Yanlong Liu, Peng Han, Chengxin Song, Fangjie Hu, Tianyi Xia, Xiangxin Wu, Binbin Cui

Abstract

Mastering right hemicolectomy techniques using laparoscopy in colorectal cancer surgery is very difficult. Although the long-term prognosis of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (LRH) and complete mesocolic excision is unquestionable, different surgeons have their own opinions on routes of conducting LRH. LRH surgery is very complex due to the upper abdominal anatomical structure and vascular variation. Therefore, it has been considered the most difficult of all colorectal cancer surgeries. Our innovative middle cranial approach (MCA) was developed to avoid unnecessary injuries and minimize the operative time, thereby reducing the patient's hospital stay and improving their short-term prognosis. We compared 90 colon cancer patients who underwent the MCA between January 2016 and January 2017 with 82 patients who underwent the conventional central approach conducted by the same group of physicians (with Dr Cui as the surgeon) from 2011 to 2015. A short-term statistical analysis was performed. A total of 90 patients were included: 43 men and 47 women. Twenty-three patients underwent abdominal surgery (including stomach, rectum, and sigmoid colon surgery; appendectomy; and uterine attachment surgery). The median age of these patients was 62.6 (28-85) years; the median BMI was 22.9 (14.7-33.3) kg/m2; the mean bleeding volume was 53.9 (10-100) ml; the mean tumour diameter was 5.7 (0.8-9) cm, and the average number of lymph nodes detected was 19.2 (7-49). Our study showed that radical resection of right-sided colon cancer using the MCA was safe and feasible for the treatment of colorectal cancer patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Researcher 2 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 7 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Unknown 9 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2018.
All research outputs
#6,441,321
of 23,016,919 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#1,289
of 6,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,624
of 442,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#63
of 161 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,016,919 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,105 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 161 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.