↓ Skip to main content

A Historical Record of Coastal Floods in Britain: Frequencies and Associated Storm Tracks

Overview of attention for article published in Natural Hazards, May 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
A Historical Record of Coastal Floods in Britain: Frequencies and Associated Storm Tracks
Published in
Natural Hazards, May 2003
DOI 10.1023/a:1022942801531
Authors

Yongqiang Zong, Michael J. Tooley

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 56 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 20%
Researcher 7 12%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 14 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 15 25%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 15%
Engineering 5 8%
Arts and Humanities 4 7%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 18 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2011.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#970
of 2,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,824
of 54,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,074 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 54,885 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.