↓ Skip to main content

Do savannah sparrows commit the concorde fallacy?

Overview of attention for article published in Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, December 1979
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Do savannah sparrows commit the concorde fallacy?
Published in
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, December 1979
DOI 10.1007/bf00292525
Authors

Patrick J. Weatherhead

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Sweden 1 2%
Romania 1 2%
Unknown 43 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 20%
Student > Bachelor 7 15%
Student > Master 7 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 9 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 46%
Psychology 5 11%
Environmental Science 3 7%
Materials Science 2 4%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 9 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2023.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
#1,551
of 3,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,848
of 28,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,430 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 28,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.