| Title |
Specific features of the stone-wales transformation in the C20 and C36 fullerenes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Physics of the Solid State, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1134/s1063783411010239 |
| Authors |
A. I. Podlivaev, K. P. Katin, D. A. Lobanov, L. A. Openov |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 43% |
| Other | 2 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 43% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 29% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2018.
All research outputs
#5,807,468
of 23,016,919 outputs
Outputs from Physics of the Solid State
#21
of 200 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,128
of 183,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physics of the Solid State
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,016,919 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 200 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.