↓ Skip to main content

Bagging Equalizes Influence

Overview of attention for article published in Machine Learning, June 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
105 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Bagging Equalizes Influence
Published in
Machine Learning, June 2004
DOI 10.1023/b:mach.0000027783.34431.42
Authors

Yves Grandvalet

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 6%
Germany 2 3%
France 1 1%
Slovakia 1 1%
Turkey 1 1%
China 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Poland 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 54 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 18%
Researcher 8 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 12 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 31 46%
Engineering 6 9%
Mathematics 4 6%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 15 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2018.
All research outputs
#16,046,765
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Machine Learning
#695
of 1,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,864
of 62,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Machine Learning
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,225 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.