↓ Skip to main content

The importance of mating system in translocation programs: reproductive success of released male bridled nailtail wallabies

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, June 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The importance of mating system in translocation programs: reproductive success of released male bridled nailtail wallabies
Published in
Biological Conservation, June 2005
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2004.11.017
Authors

D.P. Sigg, A.W. Goldizen, A.R. Pople

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 4%
Australia 2 2%
United States 2 2%
South Africa 1 1%
New Zealand 1 1%
Israel 1 1%
Unknown 83 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 20%
Researcher 17 18%
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Student > Postgraduate 7 7%
Other 25 27%
Unknown 3 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 60 64%
Environmental Science 21 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 3%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2013.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#4,133
of 6,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,294
of 68,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#20
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.