↓ Skip to main content

Dietary prevention of allergic diseases in infants and small children

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Allergy & Immunology, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
197 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dietary prevention of allergic diseases in infants and small children
Published in
Pediatric Allergy & Immunology, January 2008
DOI 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2007.00680.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arne Høst, Susanne Halken, Antonella Muraro, Sten Dreborg, Bodo Niggemann, Rob Aalberse, Syed H. Arshad, Andrea Von Berg, Kai‐Håkon Carlsen, Karel Duschén, Philippe A. Eigenmann, David Hill, Catherine Jones, Michael Mellon, Göran Oldeus, Arnold Oranje, Cristina Pascual, Susan Prescott, Hugh Sampson, Magnus Svartengren, Ulrich Wahn, Jill A. Warner, John O. Warner, Yvan Vandenplas, Magnus Wickman, Robert S. Zeiger

Abstract

Because of scientific fraud four trials have been excluded from the original Cochrane meta-analysis on formulas containing hydrolyzed protein for prevention of allergy and food intolerance in infants. Unlike the conclusions of the revised Cochrane review the export group set up by the Section on Paediatrics, European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology (SP-EAACI) do not find that the exclusion of the four trials demands a change of the previous recommendations regarding primary dietary prevention of allergic diseases. Ideally, recommendations on primary dietary prevention should be based only on the results of randomized and quasi-randomized trials (selection criteria in the Cochrane review). However, regarding breastfeeding randomization is unethical, Therefore, in the development of recommendations on dietary primary prevention, high-quality systematic reviews of high-quality cohort studies should be included in the evidence base. The study type combined with assessment of the methodological quality determines the level of evidence. In view of some methodological concerns in the Cochrane meta-analysis, particularly regarding definitions and diagnostic criteria for outcome measures and inclusion of non peer-reviewed studies/reports, a revision of the Cochrane analysis may seem warranted. Based on analysis of published peer-reviewed observational and interventional studies the results still indicate that breastfeeding is highly recommended for all infants irrespective of atopic heredity. A dietary regimen is effective in the prevention of allergic diseases in high-risk infants, particularly in early infancy regarding food allergy and eczema. The most effective dietary regimen is exclusively breastfeeding for at least 4-6 months or, in absence of breast milk, formulas with documented reduced allergenicity for at least the first 4 months, combined with avoidance of solid food and cow's milk for the first 4 months.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 9 15%
Student > Master 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 3 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 5%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 26 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 29 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2019.
All research outputs
#5,446,994
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Allergy & Immunology
#733
of 2,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,184
of 169,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Allergy & Immunology
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,238 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,047 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.