↓ Skip to main content

Genitourinary Fistula: An Indian Perspective

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Genitourinary Fistula: An Indian Perspective
Published in
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13224-015-0672-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vinod Priyadarshi, Jitendra Pratap Singh, Malay Kumar Bera, Anup Kumar Kundu, Dilip Kumar Pal

Abstract

In developing countries, obstetric trauma is the most common cause of genitourinary fistulae. But over the last two decades, health care facilities have been improved and the scenario has been changed. The aim of the present study is to share our experience with genitourinary fistula in terms of mode of presentation, diagnostic modality, and management with the emphasis on the surgical approach and a parallel review of the available literature. During a 6-year period from January 2007 to December 2013, 41 cases of genitourinary fistula, who admitted and treated in the urology department of a tertiary care center, were retrospectively analyzed for etiology, site, size and number of fistulae, clinical presentation, diagnostic modalities, and management. The literature search was done using the Medline database. Mean age of the patient was 27 years (range 16-51). Primary and simple fistulae were common. Obstetric trauma was the most common etiology (56.09 %) followed by iatrogenic (39.03 %). Vesicovaginal fistula was the most common type (78.37 %) and trigone was the most common site involved (51.72 %). 51.35 % of patients were approached successfully by the vaginal route. Ancillary procedures were required in patients for various other associated anomalies at the time of fistula repair. The success rate on follow up was 94.5 %. In the mean follow up of 3 years, 35 patients were sexually active. Genitourinary fistula is a frustrating entity with potentially devastating psychosocial consequence. Its management poses a tricky challenge to the surgeon. Accurate and timely diagnosis, adhering on basic surgical principle, and repair by an experienced surgeon provide the optimum chance of cure.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 27%
Researcher 4 18%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 4 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Linguistics 1 5%
Other 4 18%
Unknown 3 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2023.
All research outputs
#7,652,891
of 23,299,593 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India
#78
of 360 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,372
of 355,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,299,593 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 360 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.