↓ Skip to main content

Spectrum of Epstein-Barr virus-related diseases: a pictorial review

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Radiology, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#10 of 358)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
11 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
131 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
Title
Spectrum of Epstein-Barr virus-related diseases: a pictorial review
Published in
Japanese Journal of Radiology, February 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11604-008-0291-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eriko Maeda, Masaaki Akahane, Shigeru Kiryu, Nobuyuki Kato, Takeharu Yoshikawa, Naoto Hayashi, Shigeki Aoki, Manabu Minami, Hiroshi Uozaki, Masashi Fukayama, Kuni Ohtomo

Abstract

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) prevails among more than 90% of the adult population worldwide. Most primary infections occur during young childhood and cause no or only nonspecific symptoms; then the virus becomes latent and resides in lymphocytes in the peripheral blood. Inactive latent EBV usually causes no serious consequences, but once it becomes active it can cause a wide spectrum of malignancies: epithelial tumors such as nasopharyngeal and gastric carcinomas; mesenchymal tumors such as follicular dendritic cell tumor/sarcoma; and lymphoid malignancies such as Burkitt lymphoma, lymphomatoid granulomatosis, pyothorax-associated lymphoma, immunodeficiency-associated lymphoproliferative disorders, extranodal natural killer (NK) cell/T-cell lymphoma, and Hodgkin's lymphoma. The purpose of this article is to describe the spectrum of EBV-related diseases and their key imaging findings. EBV-related lymphoproliferative disorders and lymphomas are especially common in immunocompromised patients. Awareness of their clinical settings and imaging spectrum contributes to early detection and early treatment of possibly life-threatening disorders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 138 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 20%
Student > Bachelor 25 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 13%
Researcher 12 8%
Other 9 6%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 32 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 8%
Chemistry 3 2%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 35 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2020.
All research outputs
#2,072,079
of 22,780,967 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Radiology
#10
of 358 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,845
of 170,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Radiology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,967 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 358 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,700 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them