↓ Skip to main content

Mound springs of the Great Artesian Basin in South Australia: a case study from Olympic Dam

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Geology, March 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
Mound springs of the Great Artesian Basin in South Australia: a case study from Olympic Dam
Published in
Environmental Geology, March 2000
DOI 10.1007/s002540050452
Authors

G. M. Mudd

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 3%
Unknown 57 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Student > Master 5 8%
Other 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 12 20%
Unknown 12 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 17 29%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 16 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 8%
Engineering 4 7%
Unspecified 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 13 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2013.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Geology
#87
of 420 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,754
of 41,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Geology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 420 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 41,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them