↓ Skip to main content

Design tools in practice: instructional designers report which tools they use and why

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Computing in Higher Education, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
Design tools in practice: instructional designers report which tools they use and why
Published in
Journal of Computing in Higher Education, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12528-017-9165-x
Authors

Ahmed Lachheb, Elizabeth Boling

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 27%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 13%
Student > Master 6 13%
Lecturer 5 10%
Researcher 3 6%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 10 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 19 40%
Design 6 13%
Computer Science 3 6%
Mathematics 2 4%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 12 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2018.
All research outputs
#6,062,011
of 23,016,919 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Computing in Higher Education
#52
of 255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,248
of 442,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Computing in Higher Education
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,016,919 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 255 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,082 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.