↓ Skip to main content

Trigenomic Bridges for Brassica Improvement

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Trigenomic Bridges for Brassica Improvement
Published in
Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, November 2011
DOI 10.1080/07352689.2011.615700
Authors

Sheng Chen, Matthew N. Nelson, Anne-Marie Chèvre, Eric Jenczewski, Zaiyun Li, Annaliese S. Mason, Jinling Meng, Julie A. Plummer, Aneeta Pradhan, Kadambot H. M. Siddique, Rod J. Snowdon, Guijun Yan, Weijun Zhou, Wallace A. Cowling

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 105 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 22%
Student > Master 18 17%
Researcher 14 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 7%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 25 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 59 56%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 8%
Environmental Science 3 3%
Unspecified 2 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 <1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 28 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2022.
All research outputs
#7,359,219
of 23,197,711 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences
#115
of 299 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,225
of 142,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,197,711 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 299 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,805 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.