↓ Skip to main content

TNM Classification of Thyroid Carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgery, February 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
TNM Classification of Thyroid Carcinoma
Published in
World Journal of Surgery, February 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00268-006-0864-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ashok R. Shaha

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 60 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 16%
Researcher 9 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Student > Master 5 8%
Other 15 24%
Unknown 12 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 51%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 14 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2023.
All research outputs
#7,660,080
of 23,318,744 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#1,532
of 4,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,524
of 162,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#8
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,318,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 162,517 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.