↓ Skip to main content

Bell's theorem and world process

Overview of attention for article published in Il Nuovo Cimento - Section B, October 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Bell's theorem and world process
Published in
Il Nuovo Cimento - Section B, October 2007
DOI 10.1007/bf02728310
Authors

H. P. Stapp

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 38%
Professor 2 15%
Lecturer 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 7 54%
Philosophy 1 8%
Psychology 1 8%
Chemistry 1 8%
Unknown 3 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2022.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Il Nuovo Cimento - Section B
#15
of 96 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,776
of 89,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Il Nuovo Cimento - Section B
#8
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 96 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.