↓ Skip to main content

Molecular imaging with contrast ultrasound and targeted microbubbles

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, March 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
6 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
123 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
Molecular imaging with contrast ultrasound and targeted microbubbles
Published in
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, March 2004
DOI 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2004.01.003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan R Lindner

Abstract

There is growing interest in the development of methods for imaging cellular and molecular mediators of cardiovascular diseases. Techniques for imaging molecular and cellular alterations have been explored for essentially all noninvasive cardiac imaging modalities. Molecular imaging with contrast-enhanced ultrasound relies on the detection of novel site-targeted microbubble contrast agents. These microbubbles are retained within regions of a specific disease process, thereby allowing phenotypic characterization of tissue. As microbubbles are pure intravascular tracers, the disease processes assessed must be characterized by antigens that are expressed within the vascular compartment. Accordingly, the pathologic states that have been targeted include inflammation, neoplasms, angiogenesis, and thrombus formation, all of which are mediated in part by molecular events within the vascular space. This review describes (1) different strategies that have been used to target microbubbles to regions of disease, (2) the unique challenges for imaging targeted ultrasound contrast agents, and (3) some of the early experience imaging molecular events in animal models of disease.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
United Kingdom 2 3%
Netherlands 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 60 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 28%
Researcher 11 16%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Student > Master 6 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 7%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 8 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 22%
Physics and Astronomy 11 16%
Engineering 9 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 10%
Chemistry 7 10%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 11 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2019.
All research outputs
#2,863,632
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
#96
of 2,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,340
of 63,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,044 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 63,045 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them