↓ Skip to main content

Science, pseudoscience and Sellick

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, May 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Science, pseudoscience and Sellick
Published in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, May 2002
DOI 10.1007/bf03017917
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Roger Maltby, Michael T. Beriault

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 8%
Unknown 11 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 2 17%
Researcher 2 17%
Professor 2 17%
Librarian 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Other 2 17%
Unknown 2 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 58%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 8%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Unknown 2 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2023.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#1,390
of 2,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,861
of 127,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,876 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,247 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.