↓ Skip to main content

Ring Current Energy Input and Decay

Overview of attention for article published in Space Science Reviews, October 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
111 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
Ring Current Energy Input and Decay
Published in
Space Science Reviews, October 2003
DOI 10.1023/b:spac.0000007516.10433.ad
Authors

Janet U. Kozyra, Michael W. Liemohn

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Norway 1 2%
Unknown 51 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 28%
Researcher 13 25%
Student > Master 6 11%
Other 3 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 7 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 35 66%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 11%
Engineering 2 4%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2015.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Space Science Reviews
#533
of 1,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,777
of 56,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Space Science Reviews
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,214 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 56,298 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them