↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of candidate geomagnetic field models for IGRF-11

Overview of attention for article published in Earth, Planets and Space, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of candidate geomagnetic field models for IGRF-11
Published in
Earth, Planets and Space, December 2010
DOI 10.5047/eps.2010.11.005
Authors

C. C. Finlay, S. Maus, C. D. Beggan, M. Hamoudi, F. J. Lowes, N. Olsen, E. Thébault

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 28%
Researcher 6 21%
Professor 4 14%
Lecturer 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 5 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 12 41%
Engineering 6 21%
Physics and Astronomy 5 17%
Unknown 6 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2021.
All research outputs
#7,977,154
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from Earth, Planets and Space
#467
of 1,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,381
of 186,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth, Planets and Space
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,363 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,368 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.