↓ Skip to main content

The French Canadian Tay-Sachs disease deletion mutation: identification of probable founders

Overview of attention for article published in Human Genetics, April 1992
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
The French Canadian Tay-Sachs disease deletion mutation: identification of probable founders
Published in
Human Genetics, April 1992
DOI 10.1007/bf00207048
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. De Braekeleer, P. Hechtman, E. Andermann, F. Kaplan

Abstract

Tay-Sachs disease (TSD) is an inherited neurodegenerative ganglioside storage disorder caused by deficiency of the hexosaminidase A enzyme. A deletion allele (FCD) at the HEXA locus has attained high frequency in the French Canadian population. The distribution of affected probands shows a likely center of diffusion for this mutation located in the Bas-St.-Laurent and Gaspésie regions of the province of Quebec. We have reconstructed the genealogies of 15 obligate carriers of the FCD allele to an average depth of 12 generations identifying 60 ancestors and 80 European founders common to all of them. The ancestral origins of the European founders show a significantly greater number of individuals born in the French provinces of Normandy and Perche than expected based on information regarding the origins of the 8,500 immigrants who settled the colony of New France during the French regime. We have identified common ancestors among the 10 who were born in Quebec who appear to be likely candidates for the origin of the FCD mutation. One such couple had 11 children, 5 of whom settled in regions of Quebec or New Brunswick that today have elevated heterozygote frequencies for the FCD. The five offspring are ancestors of all known carriers. By contrast, the absence of FCD alleles among TSD probands in France suggests that the mutation did not occur in a European founder.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 4%
Unknown 25 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 23%
Other 4 15%
Student > Master 4 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 5 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 23%
Arts and Humanities 2 8%
Neuroscience 2 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 5 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2022.
All research outputs
#8,051,694
of 24,201,556 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#981
of 3,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,785
of 19,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#8
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,201,556 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,038 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 19,866 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.