| Title |
Minor pollinator–prey conflict in the carnivorous plant, Drosera anglica
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Ecology, October 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11258-005-9050-y |
| Authors |
Gillian L. Murza, Joanne R. Heaver, Arthur R. Davis |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 6% |
| Brazil | 3 | 5% |
| United States | 3 | 5% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 54 | 82% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 18% |
| Researcher | 12 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 9 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 45 | 68% |
| Environmental Science | 10 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2016.
All research outputs
#2,936,329
of 22,782,096 outputs
Outputs from Plant Ecology
#50
of 906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,613
of 60,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Ecology
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,782,096 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 906 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them