↓ Skip to main content

Day/night rhythms in gene expression of the normal murine heart

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Medicine, February 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
121 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
Title
Day/night rhythms in gene expression of the normal murine heart
Published in
Journal of Molecular Medicine, February 2004
DOI 10.1007/s00109-003-0520-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tami Martino, Sara Arab, Marty Straume, Denise D. Belsham, Nazneen Tata, Fang Cai, Peter Liu, Maria Trivieri, Martin Ralph, Michael J. Sole

Abstract

Molecular circadian oscillators have recently been identified in heart and many other peripheral organs; however, little is known about the physiologic significance of circadian gene cycling in the periphery. While general temporal profiles of gene expression in the heart have been described under constant lighting conditions, patterns under normal day/night conditions may be distinctly different. To understand how gene expression contributes to cardiac function, especially in human beings, it is crucial to examine these patterns in 24-h light and dark environments. High-density oligonucleotide microarrays were used to assess myocardial expression of 12,488 murine genes at 3-h intervals under the normal conditions of light and dark cycling. Variation in genetic activity was considerable, as 1,634 genes (approximately 13% of genes analyzed) exhibited statistically significant changes across the 24-h cycle. Some genes exhibited rhythmic expression, others showed abrupt change at light-to-dark and dark-to-light transitions. Importantly, genes that exhibited significant cycling rhythms mapped to key biological pathways, including for example cardiac cellular growth and remodeling, as well as transcription, translation, mitochondrial respiration, and signaling pathways. Gene expression in the heart is remarkably different in the day versus the night. Some gene cycling may be driven by the central circadian pacemaker, while other changes appear to be responses to light and dark. This has important implications regarding our understanding of how the molecular physiology of the heart is controlled, including temporal patterns of organ growth, renewal, and disease, comparative gene expression, and the most appropriate times for administration of therapy.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Israel 1 1%
India 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 72 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 15%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 8%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 17 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 13%
Neuroscience 4 5%
Engineering 3 4%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 21 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2017.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Medicine
#656
of 2,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,383
of 62,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Medicine
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.