↓ Skip to main content

Abnormal growth plate function in pigs carrying a dominant mutation in type X collagen

Overview of attention for article published in Mammalian Genome, December 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
5 patents
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Abnormal growth plate function in pigs carrying a dominant mutation in type X collagen
Published in
Mammalian Genome, December 2000
DOI 10.1007/s003350010212
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vivi H. Nielsen, Christian Bendixen, Jens Arnbjerg, Charlotte M. Sørensen, Henrik E. Jensen, Naseer M. Shukri, B. Thomsen

Abstract

We have identified a naturally occurring, dominant mutation that causes dwarfism in domestic pigs (Sus scrofa). With a positional candidate gene approach, the dwarf phenotype was shown to be a result of a single amino acid change, G590R, in the alpha1 (X) chain of type X collagen. Type X collagen is a homotrimer of alpha1(X) chains encoded by the COL10A1 gene, which is expressed in hypertrophic chondrocytes during the process of endochondral ossification. An amino acid substitution at the equivalent position in human type X collagen, G595E, has previously been shown to cause Schmid metaphyseal chondrodysplasia (SMCD), which is a relatively mild skeletal disorder associated with dwarfism and growth plate abnormality. Consistent with the clinical phenotype of SMCD patients, radiological and histological examination of the dwarf pigs revealed metaphyseal chondrodysplasia in the long bones. Yeast-based, two-hybrid protein interaction studies and in vitro assembly experiments demonstrated that the amino acid substitution interfered with the ability of the mutated collagen molecules to engage in trimerization. This work establishes that the chondrodysplastic dwarf pigs by genetic, biochemical, radiological and histological criteria provide a valid animal model of SMCD.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 21%
Researcher 3 21%
Unspecified 1 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 7%
Other 2 14%
Unknown 3 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 14%
Unspecified 1 7%
Social Sciences 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 3 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2023.
All research outputs
#3,271,154
of 22,782,096 outputs
Outputs from Mammalian Genome
#69
of 1,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,463
of 113,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mammalian Genome
#2
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,782,096 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,126 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.