| Title |
Coronal Magnetic Field Models
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Space Science Reviews, July 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11214-015-0178-3 |
| Authors |
Thomas Wiegelmann, Gordon J. D. Petrie, Pete Riley |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 49 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 26% |
| Researcher | 13 | 26% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 14 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 34 | 68% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 15 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2018.
All research outputs
#6,825,962
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Space Science Reviews
#480
of 1,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,248
of 278,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Space Science Reviews
#7
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.