↓ Skip to main content

Calcium phosphate precipitation in aqueous suspensions of phosphatidylserine-containing anionic liposomes

Overview of attention for article published in Calcified Tissue International, January 1987
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Calcium phosphate precipitation in aqueous suspensions of phosphatidylserine-containing anionic liposomes
Published in
Calcified Tissue International, January 1987
DOI 10.1007/bf02555727
Pubmed ID
Authors

E. D. Eanes, A. W. Hailer

Abstract

Liposomes prepared from 6.3:1.8:0.9:1.0 molar mixtures of phosphatidylcholine, dicetyl phosphate, cholesterol, and phosphatidylserine, respectively, (PS(+) liposomes) were compared with similarly prepared liposomes without the phosphatidylserine (PS(-) liposomes) for their effect on calcium phosphate precipitate formation in aqueous solutions at pH 7.4 and 22 degrees C. The liposomes, encapsulated with 50 mM phosphate (PI), were suspended in buffered 2.2 mM CaCl2, 0 or 1.5 mM KH2PO4 solutions and made permeable to Ca2+ fluxes with the ionophore, X-537A. External solution Ca2+ losses were found to be small in both PS(+) and PS(-) liposome suspensions when no ionophore was added. Even with 1.5 mM PI in the external solution, these losses did not exceed 0.2 mM. However, inoculating both liposome preparations with X-537A resulted in rapid, appreciable losses in solution Ca2+. Previous studies showed that in PS(-) liposomes, these latter losses were due to calcium phosphate precipitation, with the precipitate confined to the interior of the liposomes when no external PI was present, but extending to outside the liposomes when the suspending medium was rendered metastable. In the present study, Ca2+ losses resulting from intraliposomally confined precipitation were found to be marginally greater in PS(+) liposomes due primarily to a larger volume of entrapped PI available for reaction in these liposomes. However, with the addition of PI to the external solution, the reverse was observed, i.e., considerably less Ca2+ was lost in PS(+) than in PS(-) suspensions, a result of markedly less X-537A-induced precipitate forming outside PS(+) liposomes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 50%
Student > Master 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 25%
Engineering 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2018.
All research outputs
#4,694,742
of 22,782,096 outputs
Outputs from Calcified Tissue International
#303
of 1,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,061
of 45,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Calcified Tissue International
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,782,096 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,756 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 45,067 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them