↓ Skip to main content

Current and New Therapeutic Strategies for Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma: An Update

Overview of attention for article published in Drugs, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 3,511)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
21 news outlets
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user
patent
4 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
109 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
Title
Current and New Therapeutic Strategies for Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma: An Update
Published in
Drugs, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s40265-017-0841-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Inger S. Nijhof, Niels W. C. J. van de Donk, Sonja Zweegman, Henk M. Lokhorst

Abstract

Although survival of multiple myeloma patients has at least doubled during recent years, most patients eventually relapse, and treatment at this stage may be particularly complex. At the time of relapse, the use of alternative drugs to those given upfront is current practice. However, many new options are currently available for the treatment of relapsed multiple myeloma, including recently approved drugs, such as the second- and third-generation proteasome inhibitors carfilzomib and ixazomib, the immunomodulatory agent pomalidomide, the monoclonal antibodies daratumumab and elotuzumab and the histone deacetylase inhibitor panobinostat, but also new targeted agents are under active investigation (e.g. signal transduction modulators, kinesin spindle protein inhibitors, and inhibitors of NF-kB, MAPK, AKT). We here describe a new paradigm for the treatment of relapsed multiple myeloma. The final goal should be finding a balance among efficacy, toxicity, and cost and, at the end of the road, achieving long-lasting control of the disease and eventually even cure in a subset of patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 137 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 20%
Student > Master 16 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Other 10 7%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 34 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 2%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 34 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 146. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2023.
All research outputs
#287,808
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Drugs
#25
of 3,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,304
of 452,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drugs
#2
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,511 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.