↓ Skip to main content

Genome-wide association study in 79,366 European-ancestry individuals informs the genetic architecture of 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
twitter
37 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
310 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
306 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genome-wide association study in 79,366 European-ancestry individuals informs the genetic architecture of 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels
Published in
Nature Communications, January 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41467-017-02662-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xia Jiang, Paul F. O’Reilly, Hugues Aschard, Yi-Hsiang Hsu, J. Brent Richards, Josée Dupuis, Erik Ingelsson, David Karasik, Stefan Pilz, Diane Berry, Bryan Kestenbaum, Jusheng Zheng, Jianan Luan, Eleni Sofianopoulou, Elizabeth A. Streeten, Demetrius Albanes, Pamela L. Lutsey, Lu Yao, Weihong Tang, Michael J. Econs, Henri Wallaschofski, Henry Völzke, Ang Zhou, Chris Power, Mark I. McCarthy, Erin D. Michos, Eric Boerwinkle, Stephanie J. Weinstein, Neal D. Freedman, Wen-Yi Huang, Natasja M. Van Schoor, Nathalie van der Velde, Lisette C. P. G. M. de Groot, Anke Enneman, L. Adrienne Cupples, Sarah L. Booth, Ramachandran S. Vasan, Ching-Ti Liu, Yanhua Zhou, Samuli Ripatti, Claes Ohlsson, Liesbeth Vandenput, Mattias Lorentzon, Johan G. Eriksson, M. Kyla Shea, Denise K. Houston, Stephen B. Kritchevsky, Yongmei Liu, Kurt K. Lohman, Luigi Ferrucci, Munro Peacock, Christian Gieger, Marian Beekman, Eline Slagboom, Joris Deelen, Diana van Heemst, Marcus E. Kleber, Winfried März, Ian H. de Boer, Alexis C. Wood, Jerome I. Rotter, Stephen S. Rich, Cassianne Robinson-Cohen, Martin den Heijer, Marjo-Riitta Jarvelin, Alana Cavadino, Peter K. Joshi, James F. Wilson, Caroline Hayward, Lars Lind, Karl Michaëlsson, Stella Trompet, M. Carola Zillikens, Andre G. Uitterlinden, Fernando Rivadeneira, Linda Broer, Lina Zgaga, Harry Campbell, Evropi Theodoratou, Susan M. Farrington, Maria Timofeeva, Malcolm G. Dunlop, Ana M. Valdes, Emmi Tikkanen, Terho Lehtimäki, Leo-Pekka Lyytikäinen, Mika Kähönen, Olli T. Raitakari, Vera Mikkilä, M. Arfan Ikram, Naveed Sattar, J. Wouter Jukema, Nicholas J. Wareham, Claudia Langenberg, Nita G. Forouhi, Thomas E. Gundersen, Kay-Tee Khaw, Adam S. Butterworth, John Danesh, Timothy Spector, Thomas J. Wang, Elina Hyppönen, Peter Kraft, Douglas P. Kiel

Abstract

Vitamin D is a steroid hormone precursor that is associated with a range of human traits and diseases. Previous GWAS of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations have identified four genome-wide significant loci (GC, NADSYN1/DHCR7, CYP2R1, CYP24A1). In this study, we expand the previous SUNLIGHT Consortium GWAS discovery sample size from 16,125 to 79,366 (all European descent). This larger GWAS yields two additional loci harboring genome-wide significant variants (P = 4.7×10-9 at rs8018720 in SEC23A, and P = 1.9×10-14 at rs10745742 in AMDHD1). The overall estimate of heritability of 25-hydroxyvitamin D serum concentrations attributable to GWAS common SNPs is 7.5%, with statistically significant loci explaining 38% of this total. Further investigation identifies signal enrichment in immune and hematopoietic tissues, and clustering with autoimmune diseases in cell-type-specific analysis. Larger studies are required to identify additional common SNPs, and to explore the role of rare or structural variants and gene-gene interactions in the heritability of circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 306 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 306 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 53 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 15%
Student > Master 32 10%
Student > Bachelor 28 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 5%
Other 52 17%
Unknown 79 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 50 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 6%
Neuroscience 8 3%
Other 41 13%
Unknown 99 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2019.
All research outputs
#708,367
of 25,545,162 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#12,184
of 57,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,528
of 452,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#310
of 1,231 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,545,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 57,569 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,292 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,231 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.