Title |
Virus Taxonomy – 1999
|
---|---|
Published in |
Archives of Virology, April 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/s007050050515 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
C. R. Pringle |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 2% |
Canada | 1 | 2% |
Brazil | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 45 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 27% |
Researcher | 8 | 17% |
Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
Professor | 3 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 15% |
Unknown | 9 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 25% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 21% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 6% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 6% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 6% |
Other | 8 | 17% |
Unknown | 9 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2021.
All research outputs
#4,694,742
of 22,782,096 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Virology
#377
of 4,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,438
of 228,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Virology
#23
of 207 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,782,096 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,144 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,096 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 207 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.