| Title |
Object positions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, November 1991
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00134751 |
| Authors |
Kyle Johnson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Uganda | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Poland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 71 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 35% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 11% |
| Researcher | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Professor | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 15 | 19% |
| Unknown | 6 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Linguistics | 66 | 83% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 1% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 5 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2023.
All research outputs
#7,744,540
of 23,549,388 outputs
Outputs from Natural Language & Linguistic Theory
#53
of 302 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,261
of 18,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Language & Linguistic Theory
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,549,388 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 302 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 18,653 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.