↓ Skip to main content

How to preserve the antidepressive effect of sleep deprivation: A comparison of sleep phase advance and sleep phase delay

Overview of attention for article published in European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, November 1999
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
Title
How to preserve the antidepressive effect of sleep deprivation: A comparison of sleep phase advance and sleep phase delay
Published in
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, November 1999
DOI 10.1007/s004060050092
Pubmed ID
Authors

D. Riemann, A. König, F. Hohagen, A. Kiemen, U. Voderholzer, J. Backhaus, J. Bunz, B. Wesiack, L. Hermle, M. Berger

Abstract

Total sleep deprivation (TSD) leads to an immediate amelioration of depressed mood in approximately 70 % of patients with the melancholic subtype of depression. The clinical utility of this procedure is limited, as the improvement usually subsides after the next night of sleep. In the present study, 40 depressed inpatients, being free of psychoactive medication for at least 7 days and who had responded to a TSD were then distributed (according to a matched-pair design) to a sleep phase advance (SPA = time in bed scheduled from 1700-2400 hrs) or a sleep phase delay (SPD = time in bed from 0200-0700 hrs) with a succeeding shift back (for one hour in the SPA group per day) respectively shift forward (for 30 minutes in the SPD group per day), until the initial sleep phase (2300-0600 hrs) was reached after seven days again. Based on previous observations it was hypothesized that a phase advance of the sleep period should prevent responders to TSD from relapsing. Whereas 75% of the TSD responders were stabilized by the phase advanced condition and did not relapse over a period of seven days, only 40% of the patients in the phase delayed condition did not relapse. Polysomnography during the course of the study gave no evidence that the unusual sleep schedules caused prolonged sleep deprivation. Abnormalities of REM sleep persisted both in the clinical responders and non-responders after the sleep wake manipulation. It is concluded that the clinical effectiveness of TSD can be significantly improved by combining TSD with a following phase advance of the sleep period.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Unknown 66 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 12%
Researcher 6 9%
Student > Master 6 9%
Other 17 25%
Unknown 12 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 18 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 21%
Neuroscience 9 13%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 14 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2020.
All research outputs
#3,356,313
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
#207
of 1,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,787
of 37,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,673 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 37,616 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them