↓ Skip to main content

Synthetic fibers as an indicator of land application of sludge

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Pollution, November 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
5 policy sources
twitter
6 X users
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
544 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
915 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Synthetic fibers as an indicator of land application of sludge
Published in
Environmental Pollution, November 2005
DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2005.04.013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kimberly Ann V. Zubris, Brian K. Richards

Abstract

Synthetic fabric fibers have been proposed as indicators of past spreading of wastewater sludge. Synthetic fiber detectability was examined in sludges (dewatered, pelletized, composted, alkaline-stabilized) and in soils from experimental columns and field sites applied with those sludge products. Fibers (isolated by water extraction and examined using polarized light microscopy) were detectable in sludge products and in soil columns over 5 years after application, retaining characteristics observed in the applied sludge. Concentrations mirrored (within a factor of 2) predictions based on soil dilution. Fibers were detectable in field site soils up to 15 years after application, again retaining the characteristics seen in sludge products. Concentrations correlated with residual sludge metal concentration gradients in a well-characterized field site. Fibers found along preferential flow paths and/or in horizons largely below the mixed layer suggest some potential for translocation. Synthetic fibers were shown to be rapid and semi-quantitative indicators of past sludge application.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 915 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 909 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 142 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 135 15%
Student > Bachelor 130 14%
Researcher 93 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 3%
Other 89 10%
Unknown 300 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 223 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 89 10%
Engineering 70 8%
Chemistry 59 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 34 4%
Other 94 10%
Unknown 346 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2024.
All research outputs
#725,843
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Pollution
#313
of 13,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#924
of 79,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Pollution
#1
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,928 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.