↓ Skip to main content

Correlated and uncorrelated fitness landscapes and how to tell the difference

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Cybernetics, September 1990
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
431 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Correlated and uncorrelated fitness landscapes and how to tell the difference
Published in
Biological Cybernetics, September 1990
DOI 10.1007/bf00202749
Authors

E. Weinberger

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
United States 3 2%
Germany 2 2%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Iceland 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 117 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 35%
Researcher 19 14%
Professor 15 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Student > Master 10 8%
Other 19 14%
Unknown 13 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 53 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 13%
Engineering 17 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 5%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 15 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2021.
All research outputs
#7,451,942
of 22,782,096 outputs
Outputs from Biological Cybernetics
#185
of 675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,327
of 15,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Cybernetics
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,782,096 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 675 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 15,335 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them