↓ Skip to main content

Geographic distribution patterns and status assessment of threatened plants in China

Overview of attention for article published in Biodiversity and Conservation, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
Title
Geographic distribution patterns and status assessment of threatened plants in China
Published in
Biodiversity and Conservation, April 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10531-008-9384-6
Authors

Yin-Bo Zhang, Ke-Ping Ma

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
Indonesia 1 1%
Austria 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 75 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 21%
Student > Master 10 12%
Professor 5 6%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 17 21%
Unknown 8 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 56%
Environmental Science 15 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 11 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2022.
All research outputs
#7,916,538
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#1,131
of 2,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,315
of 83,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#8
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,128 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.