↓ Skip to main content

Violence as a risk factor for postpartum depression in mothers: a meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Women's Mental Health, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
2 policy sources
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
165 Mendeley
Title
Violence as a risk factor for postpartum depression in mothers: a meta-analysis
Published in
Archives of Women's Mental Health, March 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00737-011-0248-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qian Wu, Hong-Lin Chen, Xu-Juan Xu

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to examine the association between violence and postpartum depression (PPD). The data sources of this study are: Web of Science, PubMed, Elsevier, Springer Link were examined from their start date through July1, 2011. "Violence", "domestic violence", "physical violence", "sexual violence", "domestic violence", "postpartum depression", "postnatal depression", and "puerperal depression" were some of the terms included in the purview of MeSH terms. Relevant studies from reference lists were also scanned. Studies examining the association between violence and postpartum depression have been included. A total of 679 studies were included in this screening. Essential information of these included studies was independently extracted by two raters. Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess the clinical data of these research studies. Random-effects model was chosen in this meta-analysis for maintaining significant heterogeneity. Publication bias was evaluated with the help of a funnel plot. Six studies involving 3,950 participants were included in this clinical study. Violence was one of the factors responsible for PPD [OR = 3.47; 95% confidence interval (CI; 2.13-5.64)]. Significant heterogenity was found in this meta-analysis (P < 0.00001; I (2) = 79%)and publication bias was detected through a funnel plot. A sensitivity analysis of 3.00, 95%CI (2.44-3.68), p < 0.00001 indicated that our findings were robust and reliable. Our meta-analysis indicated a positive correlation between violence and PPD. In women of reproductive age, PPD induced through violence can be prevented through early identification. In addition, due to heterogeneity and wide CIs in this meta-analysis, further research is evidently required.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 161 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 14%
Student > Master 22 13%
Student > Bachelor 18 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 10%
Student > Postgraduate 10 6%
Other 36 22%
Unknown 40 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 34 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 32 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 12%
Social Sciences 19 12%
Unspecified 3 2%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 44 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2019.
All research outputs
#1,886,427
of 22,782,096 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Women's Mental Health
#119
of 921 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,251
of 155,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Women's Mental Health
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,782,096 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 921 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,851 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.