↓ Skip to main content

Strongyloidiasis: A review of the evidence for Australian practitioners

Overview of attention for article published in Australian Journal of Rural Health, July 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#40 of 824)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Strongyloidiasis: A review of the evidence for Australian practitioners
Published in
Australian Journal of Rural Health, July 2005
DOI 10.1111/j.1440-1584.2005.00710.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fay H. Johnston, Peter S. Morris, Richard Speare, James McCarthy, Bart Currie, Dan Ewald, Wendy Page, Karen Dempsey

Abstract

To summarise the available evidence concerning the prevalence, clinical manifestations, diagnosis and management of strongyloidiasis in Northern Australia.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 45 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 17%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Unspecified 3 6%
Professor 3 6%
Other 13 28%
Unknown 7 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Unspecified 3 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 4%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 9 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2020.
All research outputs
#1,981,230
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Australian Journal of Rural Health
#40
of 824 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,085
of 68,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australian Journal of Rural Health
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 824 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,774 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them