↓ Skip to main content

The relationship of statins to rhabdomyolysis, malignancy, and hepatic toxicity: Evidence from clinical trials

Overview of attention for article published in Current Atherosclerosis Reports, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
The relationship of statins to rhabdomyolysis, malignancy, and hepatic toxicity: Evidence from clinical trials
Published in
Current Atherosclerosis Reports, February 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11883-009-0016-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alawi A. Alsheikh-Ali, Richard H. Karas

Abstract

3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) are among the most commonly prescribed and studied drugs in modern medicine. Their proven benefit in prevention of cardiovascular events is driven by their ability to markedly reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Recent analyses have provided insight into the relationship between statin-induced reductions in LDL-C and risk of rhabdomyolysis, liver toxicity, and cancer. Risk of statin-associated elevated liver enzymes and rhabdomyolysis is not related to the magnitude of LDL-C lowering. Instead, drug- and dose-specific effects of statins are more important determinants of liver and muscle toxicity than magnitude of LDL-C lowering. Furthermore, although there is an inverse association between LDL-C and cancer risk in both statin-treated and comparable control cohorts, statin therapy, despite significantly reducing LDL-C, is not associated with an increased risk of cancer.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 9%
Unknown 10 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 27%
Student > Bachelor 2 18%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 2 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 18%
Mathematics 1 9%
Sports and Recreations 1 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2016.
All research outputs
#4,694,742
of 22,782,096 outputs
Outputs from Current Atherosclerosis Reports
#245
of 763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,719
of 185,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Atherosclerosis Reports
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,782,096 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 763 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,888 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them