↓ Skip to main content

Sexual bondage: A review and unobtrusive investigation

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, December 1995
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
wikipedia
16 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
Title
Sexual bondage: A review and unobtrusive investigation
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, December 1995
DOI 10.1007/bf01542185
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kurt E. Ernulf, Sune M. Innala

Abstract

To investigate unobtrusively how individuals experience sexual bondage, we analyzed all messages about sexual bondage (N = 514) mailed to an international computerized discussion group on sexual bondage in 1990. The most frequent individual experience reported (n = 60) was playful use of bondage to explore new areas of sexual pleasure. Other frequent experiences were the exchange of power, intensified sexual pleasure, and tactile stimulation and bodily sensations. Preference for the dominant-initiator role was expressed in 71% of the messages by male heterosexuals, 11% of the messages by heterosexual females, and 12% of the messages by homosexual males. Preference for the submissive-recipient role was expressed in 29% of the messages by heterosexual males, 89% by heterosexual females, and 88% by homosexual males. In 33% of messages subjects stated that sexual bondage occurred simultaneously with sadomasochism or was perceived as part of it.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
New Zealand 1 2%
Luxembourg 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
Unknown 47 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 18%
Student > Master 8 16%
Researcher 4 8%
Lecturer 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 14 27%
Unknown 8 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 16 31%
Social Sciences 14 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 10 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2024.
All research outputs
#3,445,921
of 25,547,324 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#1,418
of 3,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,343
of 80,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,547,324 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,761 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 80,082 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them