↓ Skip to main content

Charge Structure and Dynamics in Thunderstorms

Overview of attention for article published in Space Science Reviews, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
Title
Charge Structure and Dynamics in Thunderstorms
Published in
Space Science Reviews, April 2008
DOI 10.1007/s11214-008-9338-z
Authors

Maribeth Stolzenburg, Thomas C. Marshall

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Sweden 1 1%
France 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 64 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 26%
Researcher 12 17%
Student > Master 7 10%
Professor 5 7%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 11 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 25 36%
Physics and Astronomy 19 28%
Environmental Science 4 6%
Engineering 4 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 14 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2019.
All research outputs
#7,451,942
of 22,782,096 outputs
Outputs from Space Science Reviews
#464
of 1,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,418
of 81,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Space Science Reviews
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,782,096 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,084 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,676 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.