↓ Skip to main content

Pitfalls in the approach to pica

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Pediatrics, September 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Pitfalls in the approach to pica
Published in
European Journal of Pediatrics, September 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00431-006-0282-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Fotoulaki, Paraskevi Panagopoulou, Ioannis Efstratiou, Sanda Nousia-Arvanitakis

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 21%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Professor 2 11%
Other 4 21%
Unknown 3 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 53%
Psychology 3 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 11%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2020.
All research outputs
#7,451,942
of 22,782,096 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Pediatrics
#1,457
of 3,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,528
of 67,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Pediatrics
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,782,096 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,696 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,422 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.