↓ Skip to main content

Best practices in risk and crisis communication: Implications for natural hazards management

Overview of attention for article published in Natural Hazards, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
130 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
307 Mendeley
Title
Best practices in risk and crisis communication: Implications for natural hazards management
Published in
Natural Hazards, September 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11069-012-0386-z
Authors

Toddi A. Steelman, Sarah McCaffrey

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 307 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 294 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 60 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 19%
Researcher 44 14%
Student > Bachelor 21 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 5%
Other 47 15%
Unknown 62 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 66 21%
Environmental Science 39 13%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 21 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 20 7%
Psychology 14 5%
Other 66 21%
Unknown 81 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2018.
All research outputs
#6,491,162
of 23,016,919 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#766
of 1,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,032
of 172,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#7
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,016,919 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,832 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.