↓ Skip to main content

A Quality-Effects Model for Meta-Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Epidemiology, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
206 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Quality-Effects Model for Meta-Analysis
Published in
Epidemiology, January 2008
DOI 10.1097/ede.0b013e31815c24e7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Suhail A. R. Doi, Lukman Thalib

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Spain 2 2%
Indonesia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 106 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 19%
Researcher 21 18%
Student > Master 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 6%
Other 25 21%
Unknown 21 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 29%
Psychology 10 9%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Other 29 25%
Unknown 27 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2020.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Epidemiology
#1,879
of 3,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,438
of 168,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epidemiology
#8
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,492 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,384 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.