↓ Skip to main content

The treatment of staphylococcal infections with special reference to pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and pharmacoeconomic considerations

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, June 1997
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
The treatment of staphylococcal infections with special reference to pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and pharmacoeconomic considerations
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, June 1997
DOI 10.1023/a:1008609718457
Pubmed ID
Authors

R Janknegt

Abstract

The choice of antibiotics for the treatment of staphylococcal infections depends to a high degree on the susceptibility patterns in the hospital in question. These may be highly variable and considerable differences between countries and hospitals exist. The insight into the pharmacodynamic aspects of antimicrobial agents has increased considerably in the last 5 years, resulting in new treatments, such as once daily administration of aminoglycosides and continuous infusion of betalactam antibiotics. The antibiotic policy in Dutch hospitals for the treatment of staphylococcal infections is discussed. In most Western countries with a relatively low incidence of MRSA, penicillin-derivatives, such as flucloxacillin (or cloxacillin, methicillin and nafcillin) will be the drug of choice, because of their good in-vitro activity, low toxicity, good clinical efficacy and relatively low cost. If the incidence of MRSA increases, drugs such as the glycopeptides will be of more importance. This will of course have a clear economic impact, as both vancomycin and teicoplanin are considerably more expensive than agents such as flucloxacillin and oral treatment is not possible. Pharmacoeconomic aspects also play a role. As a rule, intravenous antimicrobial agents are considerably more expensive than the oral formulations. Before oral administration can be recommended, a reliable oral absorption, also in seriously ill patients, must have been demonstrated. Other aspects that influence the cost of therapy are hospital stay and the possibility of outpatient treatment.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 4%
Unknown 24 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 24%
Other 5 20%
Researcher 4 16%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 5 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 20%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 5 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2023.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#632
of 1,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,449
of 29,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,579 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,199 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them