↓ Skip to main content

Screening of basidiomycetes for antimicrobial activities

Overview of attention for article published in Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, August 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
19 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
168 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
Title
Screening of basidiomycetes for antimicrobial activities
Published in
Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, August 2000
DOI 10.1023/a:1026552024021
Pubmed ID
Authors

Inmaculada Suay, Francisco Arenal, Francisco J. Asensio, Angela Basilio, M. Angeles Cabello, M. Teresa Díez, Juan B. García, Antonio González del Val, Julián Gorrochategui, Pilar Hernández, Fernando Peláez, M. Francisca Vicente

Abstract

As a part of a screening programme developed to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of basidiomycetes, 317 isolates representing 204 species collected in Spain were screened against a range of human clinical pathogens and laboratory controls. Extracts from 45% of the isolates, representing 109 species, showed antimicrobial activity. Antibacterial activity was more pronounced than antifungal activity. The proportion of extracts from basidiomycetes showing antimicrobial activity was similar to or above that obtained for representative orders of Ascomycetes, such as Pezizales and Xylariales, but lower than that produced by members of the orders Diaporthales, Eurotiales, Hypocreales, Leotiales and Sordariales. Suprageneric taxa (orders and families) did not show pronounced differences in their antimicrobial activities though such differences were observed at the genus level, suggesting that the ability to produce these bioactive compounds is not homogenously distributed amongst the basidiomycetes. Isolates from some species showed large differences in their ability to produce metabolites with antimicrobial activity, possibly reflecting genetic differences at the infraspecific level.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 2%
Spain 2 1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 157 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 20%
Researcher 31 19%
Student > Master 23 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 30 18%
Unknown 27 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 66 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 11%
Chemistry 17 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 5%
Environmental Science 7 4%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 38 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2024.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Antonie van Leeuwenhoek
#601
of 2,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,802
of 38,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Antonie van Leeuwenhoek
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,151 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 38,133 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.