↓ Skip to main content

Enzymatic Saccharification of Lignocelluloses Should be Conducted at Elevated pH 5.2–6.2

Overview of attention for article published in BioEnergy Research, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
149 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
Title
Enzymatic Saccharification of Lignocelluloses Should be Conducted at Elevated pH 5.2–6.2
Published in
BioEnergy Research, October 2012
DOI 10.1007/s12155-012-9273-4
Authors

T. Q. Lan, Hongming Lou, J. Y. Zhu

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 129 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 21%
Student > Master 21 16%
Researcher 18 14%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 26 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 27%
Engineering 15 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 9%
Chemistry 11 8%
Environmental Science 10 8%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 33 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2015.
All research outputs
#8,064,660
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from BioEnergy Research
#78
of 614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,276
of 186,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioEnergy Research
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 614 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.