↓ Skip to main content

X-ray bursts

Overview of attention for article published in Space Science Reviews, September 1993
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
18 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
575 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
X-ray bursts
Published in
Space Science Reviews, September 1993
DOI 10.1007/bf00196124
Authors

Walter H. G. Lewin, Jan Van Paradijs, Ronald E. Taam

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 65 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 15%
Student > Master 9 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 11 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 52 79%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Unknown 12 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2023.
All research outputs
#7,404,662
of 22,641,687 outputs
Outputs from Space Science Reviews
#462
of 1,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,805
of 20,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Space Science Reviews
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,641,687 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,081 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 20,012 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them