| Title |
Unusual allometry for sexual size dimorphism in a cichlid where males are extremely larger than females
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings: Plant Sciences, May 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12038-010-0030-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kazutaka Ota, Masanori Kohda, Tetsu Sato |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 40 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 19% |
| Researcher | 8 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 14% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 3 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 74% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 5% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 64. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2024.
All research outputs
#673,936
of 25,525,181 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings: Plant Sciences
#6
of 983 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,842
of 104,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings: Plant Sciences
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,525,181 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 983 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them